The following
section describes the individual components of a gas chromatograph, their
technical design, and provides notes on their practical operation.
"If the column is described as the heart of chromatography, then
sample introduction may, with some justification, be referred to as the
Achilles heel"
V.
Pretorius and W.Bertsch, HRC & CC, 6/1983, 64
This quote
illustrates the fact that a patented solution for sample introduction in gas
chromatography is still not available. Technically, it is not easy to introduce
a small amount of liquid having a volume of 0.1-1 microlitres
precisely and reproducibly into a system at excess pressure. Consequently,
there are a large number of designs and techniques of sample introduction; the
two most familiar are described as follows.

This type of
sample introduction is based on a simple principle. A microlitre
syringe is used to puncture the septum, a rubber-like membrane; the needle is
inserted fully and the plunger is pressed down to inject a measured amount of
liquid into the vaporisation chamber of the injector,
whose temperature should be several tens of degrees higher than the boiling
point of the mixture. The vaporisation chamber
usually consists of a glass tube, or liner, with an internal diameter of 2-5 millimetres. An obstruction is usually positioned in the
middle of the liner to intercept the drop of liquid ejected from the syringe.
On this obstruction, the drop must then be vaporised
fully and rapidly, if possible, into a small gas cloud. This procedure is also
termed flash vaporisation. The gas cloud is then
transported by a flow of carrier gas into the column, where the actual
separation takes place.
This type of
sample introduction has the following basic disadvantages:
·
The drop of liquid is not vaporised
instantaneously but over a certain time period. During this period, the flow of
carrier gas disperses the gas cloud.
·
The expulsion of the gas cloud from the injector into
the column is a process comparable with a dilution series. The concentration
profile of an injected sample at the outlet of the injector exhibits the
typical, exponential characteristic of such processes over the last part. In
principle, this applies to all sample introduction systems but is particularly
evident in the case of this simple construction.

Fig. 24: Injector with split
This design allows
the flow of carrier gas to be split after introduction of the sample. In this
case, the flow of gas through the injector is much larger than through the
separation column. Fig. 23 is meant to demonstrate this. First, the injected
sample is vaporised. The gas cloud is transported by
the carrier gas to the split, where the gas flow is separated. The smaller
portion flows into the column (usually consisting of a capillary column), while
the larger portion escapes through the line leading to the split valve. The
ratio of the gas flow through the column and the escaping gas flow is termed
the split ratio. This value typically lies between 1:10 and 1:100. Two results
are achieved by this process:

Fig. 25: Concentration profile with and without split
Due to the
relatively high speed at which the gas cloud flows past the split point in the
injector, the concentration-time characteristic of the test substances is much
narrower, i.e. the tailing at the peak end is greatly reduced by the expulsion
process
The absolute quantity of the test substance reaching the column is reduced by
the same factor as the split ratio. This is a necessity for capillary columns,
as their capacity for carrying substances requiring separation is several
degrees of magnitude lower than that of packed columns. The following sample
calculation is meant to elucidate this: Assume that a carrier gas flows through
the column at a rate of 10 ml/min. and that the flow rate through the split
outlet is 90 ml/min. When the gas cloud flows past the split point at a rate of
100 ml/min., only 10% of the injected sample will reach the column.
This type of
column consists of a chromium-steel or glass tube containing a porous material
with a particle diameter of 0.05 to 0.5 mm which acts as the carrier and is
coated with the stationary, liquid phase. The large surface area of this
substance allows rapid attainment of the diffusion equilibrium between the
mobile gaseous phase and the stationary liquid phase. Depending on the
application involved, the proportion by mass of the liquid phases lies between
0.5 and 25%. Packed columns contain much more liquid phase than capillary
columns and are thus very suitable for separating highly volatile components as
well as large sample quantities,

Design of a packed column
particularly in conjunction with a thermal conductivity detector
(TCD). Due to its design, the TCD is less sensitive than other detectors, such
as the flame ionisation detector (FID). Standard
version 1 of the device used here comprises a chromium-steel packed column with
an internal diameter of 2 mm and a length of 2 m. Its carrier material consists
of a preparation of diatomite with a grain size of 80-100 mesh and a coating of
5 % polydimethylsiloxane (OV-1).
Nowadays,
these columns usually consist of a thin-walled tube made of pure quartz SiO2,
or fused silica. Columns like this are also termed open tubular columns (OTC).
Here, the stationary phase consists of a thin film applied to the inside of the
tube wall. Often, this film is also fixed to the silicon dioxide by means of
chemical bonds. This allows the columns to be washed using suitable solvents
without loosening the lining. For mechanical protection, the columns are
usually equipped with a plastic coating of polyimide. Capillary columns are
commercially available in graduated internal and external diameters:
Internal
• External
0.10mm
0.27mm
0.20mm 0.35mm
0.25mm 0.38mm
0.32mm 0.48mm
0.53mm 0.75mm
The film
thickness of the stationary phase varies between 0.1 and 5 micrometers. The
columns have a standard length of between 10 and 50 meters. The above-mentioned
distribution characteristics only apply approximately to low concentrations. If
a column is overloaded in an attempt to separate large quantities of
substances, distorted peaks occur, thus impairing the separation efficiency. It
is clearly evident that columns with a thicker stationary phase can handle
larger quantities of substances for the purpose of analysis. On the other hand,
the diffusion processes forming the basis of separation are generally faster
and more extensive if small dimensions are involved, i.e. thin columns with
small film thicknesses for the stationary phase provide higher separation
efficiency.
A compromise
needs to be struck between these two conflicting requirements. This compromise
is closely related to the detector used, as the substances emerging from the
column need to generate an electrical signal in the detector. In any
measurement circuit however, a detector always has the fundamental property of
generating an interference signal which is termed noise. Just like weak signals
from broadcasting stations easily fade on the radio, a very small peak is
easily drowned by the inherent noise in the detector circuit. Put differently:
Sensitive detectors like the flame ionisation
detector allow the use of low-capacity columns which have a
high separation efficiency, whereas a thermal conductivity detector, for
example, requires the use of high-capacity columns due to its much lower
sensitivity. Version 2 of this device, for example, uses a micro TCD in
conjunction with a capillary column with an internal diameter of 0.53 mm and a
film thickness of 5 micrometers.
The detector
of a chromatograph is meant to output an electronic signal when a component of
the substance to be analysed emerges from the column.
There are diverse methods of generating such electrical signals, one of them
being the thermal conductivity detector described in the following.
The ability of
gases to conduct heat depends directly on the mass of their molecules.
According to the kinetic theory of gases, light molecules are better conductors
of heat than heavy ones. This fact is made use of by the TCD. Fig. 27 shows its
fundamental design. The carrier gas from the separation column flows through a
cylindrical chamber containing a thin wire made of a tungsten alloy. This wire,
or filament, has an electrical resistance R which depends on the temperature of
the filament. In the case of metals, this resistance generally increases with
the temperature. Such conductors are said to have a positive temperature
coefficient (PTC). If a current I flows through the
resistance, the voltage VDet through it is
determined using Ohm's law:
VDet = R(T) • I

Principle of the TCD
If a component
with a higher molecular mass than that of the carrier gas emerges from the
column, the heat from the heating filament is channelled
off more slowly by the gas mixture. Consequently, the temperature T of the
filament rises, and so does its electrical resistance. Given a constant current
I, UDet also rises
as a result. This configuration hence indicates changes in the composition of a
carrier gas in the form of voltage variations.
However, one
disadvantage of this simple detector is that any other extraneous factor
influencing the temperature of the filament also influences the voltage UDet and is thus superimposed on the effective signal.
Examples of such undesirable effects are:
·
Change in the flow of gas
·
Variations in the operating voltage
·
Change in the ambient temperature

TCD with a reference cell
In practice
therefore, the detector is not used in the form described above. The
configuration shown in Fig.
28
proves much more practical. In this case, the carrier gas flows through a
second measurement cell before entering the injector. Both measurement cells
are located together in a metal block possessing a high thermal conductivity.
Here too, the current I results in a voltage drop URef
across the heating filament. In the absence of a test substance, UDet should be equal to URef
if both the tungsten wires are identical and thus have the same resistance. The
bridge voltage UDet-URef should
be zero. This no longer applies on the emergence of a component from the
column. Now a difference arises between UDet
and URef. In a first approximation, this
difference is proportional to the concentration of the expelled component. The
voltage is amplified and recorded as a function of time.
Why is this
detector much less sensitive to changes in the variables mentioned above? For
example, let us assume that the ambient temperature rises. As the filaments are
thermally coupled, this rise affects both of them in equal measure.
Consequently, UDet and URef
rise, the difference between these two values ideally remaining constant.
Ideally speaking, changes in the flow of the carrier gas do not affect the
bridge voltage either, as such changes influence the temperature of both
filaments, i.e. UDet and URef change accordingly but the difference
between them remains nearly constant.
Summary of the essential properties of a TCD:
·
At low concentrations of foreign substances, the
output signal is proportional to the concentration.
·
The sensitivity of a TCD depends on the substances
involved.
·
The dimensions of the measurement cell of a TCD must
remain above a certain limit. The minimum diameter of such cells is approx. 2
mm; the volume is relatively large for gas flows in standard capillary columns.
A TCD can only be used successfully in conjunction with capillary columns if
these columns have a sufficient width (e.g. 0.53 mm internal diameter) and high
film thickness (e.g. 5 micrometers).
·
TCDs are non-destructive, i.e. the eluted substances
are not changed.
·
TCDs are not particularly suitable for trace analysis.
·
TCDs should only be used with carrier gases possessing
a high thermal conductivity. Hydrogen and helium are suitable for this purpose.
·
If the temperature of the column furnace has been
programmed, the reference line can be expected to drift.
·
In the hot state, the tungsten filaments of the TCD
might be adversely affected through oxidation by oxygen in the carrier gas.
This can happen, for example, if the flow of carrier gas has inadvertently not
been turned on. On no account must the TCD be operated with air for extended
periods!
The flame
ionisation detector used in your device is much more efficient than the thermal
conductivity detector described previously. Its operation is described in this
chapter.

Operating principle of the FID
If a hydrogen
flame is placed between the plates of a charged capacitor as shown below, a low
electrical current of a few hundred femtoamperes (10-15A)
flows through the circuit. It is assumed that thermal ionisation
gives rise to free electrons and ions, although the yield of charged particles
is very low. However, if the flow of hydrogen in such a configuration includes
substances containing C‑H bonds, e.g. alkanes, the current rises sharply.
This is attributed to the formation of CHO+ ions and free electrons from CH· radicals. However, the yield of ions is very low in
this case too. On average, only a handful of charge carriers are obtained from
500 000 atoms of carbon; nevertheless, this effect can be used successfully to
detect hydrocarbons and related compounds. The schematic diagram below shows
the technical design of the FID. The gas mixture to be analysed
emerges from the capillary column right below a metallic nozzle (1). From
there, it is transported by the hydrogen flow to the flame. Purified air is fed
to this flame via separate channels. A circular electrode (2) is located above
the flame; this electrode together with the nozzle, the voltage source (3) and
the current-voltage converter (4) forms a closed electrical circuit. This
detector must be heated to prevent condensation of the substances eluted from
the column and of the H20 produced in this process.
Summary of the essential properties of an FID:

Fig.30: Technical design of the FID
In general,
the following types of gas can be used for the operation of capillary columns:
hydrogen, noble gases, e.g. helium, and nitrogen, whereas the higher the molar
mass, the more suitable the gas. This is because gases with a high molar mass
have a low diffusion rate, thus increasing the separation efficiency of a
column in theory. In practice, this difference is only noticeable at very low
flow rates and column admission pressures. The advantage of hydrogen as the
carrier gas is that only one gas needs to be used in this case. Due to the low
viscosity of hydrogen though, even small leaks into the system lead to
considerable losses of hydrogen gas. The screw connection between the column
and injector is of particular importance here. The conical seals made of Vespel® tend to shrink somewhat during the first few
heating cycles. Consequently, the column connections should always be tightened
after the first two heating cycles. These sealing joints should be checked on a
regular basis.
In general:
The carrier gas should be as pure as possible; a purity grade of 5.0 (99.999%)
is recommended here. The price difference compared with lower purity grades is
insignificant, but noticeable compared with purity grades higher than 5.0.
Oxygen is the
enemy of all capillary columns. Particularly polar phases like Carbowax® are attacked even by small quantities of oxygen
during heating. This leads to a continual worsening of the separation
efficiency. If polar phases are used frequently, it is advisable to integrate
an oxygen absorber in the carrier gas supply line. Such filters, e.g. the
product Oxisorb®, are available commercially and
stated in the list of accessories in the appendix.
This device
does not have an integrated pressure control unit. If the pressure pump is equipped
with a two-stage pressure reducer and the manometer on the low-pressure side
has a sufficiently small measurement range (0-1.5 bar), a separate control unit
is not necessary. The gas lines should not be made of rubber or PVC tubes, as
these materials do not prevent the diffusion of oxygen to a sufficient degree.
Teflon or copper tubes with screw connections are suitable; adapters for this
purpose are available as accessories.

Separation efficiency vs. gas flow
The figure
above shows the separation efficiency of a column as the function of the gas
flow. This graph - a modified display of the Van Deemter
function- shows that the gas flow in a separating process can be optimised. This optimal value must be determined
empirically. From its peak point, the efficiency curve drops less sharply
toward larger gas flows than toward smaller gas flows; therefore, when in
doubt, select a flow rate (pressure) which is slightly higher than the optimal
value. In the case of this device, the suitable admission pressure lies between
0.1 and 1.0 bar if helium is used.